Thanks to Peter Babcock, Edwin Smaal and
Vince Scimeca
Strategy and useful tips - by Edwin Smaal
A bit of history:
A few years ago, my first experience in the EFL's was with LEFL
and UEFL, back then the most famous EFL's around. Then I got a mail from Shane,
who commissioned the unknown L&AEFL for me, saying he was expanding and had a
few spots available. I started reading his rules, and was instantly fascinated
by depth and possibilities of this type of EFL. I literally studied his rule set
for 15 - 20 hours, I wanted to know every detail about the game. Back then the
rule set was very unclear. But after about 40 emails with Shane, I knew
everything about L&AEFL before i ever played 1 match.
I made my team, called Kamikaze, who started in division 2. I
could not wait until the first match. With my knowledge of all the details of
the game, I quickly took hold of the 1st place in the division, and kept it
throughout the first season. I was investing in the future and learning from the
more experienced managers, by examining what they did. This was the best EFL I
had ever played in. I was so excited, I quicky started my own league called
WWEFL, and quit UEFL and LEFL because of lack of time.
Unfortunately Shane quit his league unexecpectedly for many, and
I haven't heard from him since.
At that time Peter had just started with SAEFL, and I was
lucky to be a part of that. As of today I am still a manager in this great
league, with my team Alcohol Anonymous. And because of his and my league i am
writing this article to help out starting managers, as it is likely that this
type of EFL will dominate the EFL-based games in the future.
This is just a first article in which I will start fencing
with some common points/problems. Maybe in a later article, will i explain them
in more depth.
1) Creating your team
2) Choice of tactics
Ofcourse the choice of tactics depend on alot of other
things, including the choice of tactic you expect your opponent will use, and on
the depth of your squad etc.
3) Choice of Style
4) Choice of formation
5) Rotating your team
6) Grudging
Then when do you use a grudge card ??
* In a match you are not certain you will win, a match that will
be very close. Where a grudge card will make the difference between the 1-0
defeat and the 1-2 victory.
* A match that requires a Grudge, like a Cup Final, or a match
against your all-time rival !!
7) Depth vs Power
But now my personal opinion on this. I always choice for
depth in the beginning. It will earn you more league points and more cash. Power
is something I build on during the 2nd and 3rd season. In my first season, your
team is so small, that rotating is very difficult. That is why I advice you go
for depth in the 1st and 2nd season. If you do choice a power team, and get
injuries to one of your key players, your team is much more vunerable than
depth-teams.
I don't mind losing from another top-team, as I know that he
will lose points along the way, and most likey more than I will.
This doesn't mean that you have to get rid of your power players
as quickly as possible. Only do it if the right deal comes along. For instance 2
NSL 7.5 players can be more valueble than 1 NSL 10 player in the beginning.
Power teams will want to keep the NSL 10 player.
8) Trading
Coming back to my depth squad, for a starting manager it might be wise to trade that special NSL 10 player for 2 NSL 7 - 8 players.
Think both long term as short term. For short term you just need good NSL/EMP players, age not important. For long term, try and acquire some young players with potential. Aging can kick your ass if you don't control it. In the important positions for your tactic, try and acquire good players who can carry you for several seasons. So remember that a 18yo NSL 7 player is worth much more than a 32yo NSL 7 player. The 18yo will increase in NSL, while the 32yo will decrease or even retire.
If you are not certain about a deal, ask the commissioner for
advice.
9) Finance
I hope this helps. It is only a basic summary of the strategy in this type of EFL, and much more can and will be said. It is a mere guideline for interested managers, ofcourse everyone makes his own choices, and that is what makes the game so much fun.
12-02-1999 Edwin Smaal (Manager AA, commish WWEFL)
Strategy Article By Vince Scimeca
for Shane Wright Style EFL (SAEFL, WWEFL, GEFL)
Let me begin by saying that Edwin Smaal (manager of AA and Commissioner of the WWEFL) has written an excellent strategy article which gives may useful tips for this style league. It can be found at http://www.icon.co.za/Edstrategy.html
This article is meant to compliment that article and give my input and insights from playing in this style league since its inception by Shane Wright with the L&AEFL.
The L&AEFL was a new style Play By EMail soccer league which, in my opinion, is far more realistic then the LEFL and old EEFL. Those style leagues are more like complex math formulas in which the clubs that do well have figured out how to coach, train and rotate their players to achieve success. This EFL style developed by Shane Wright is based on a player profile that exists in a database in which the skill is already determined for each season of their career. In addition the player also has "hidden" qualities that the manager may or may not figure out over time, such as leadership, determination, team ethic etc. This in conjunction with the style and tactic that the manager chooses to play on his club and the style and tactic that is played against him, will determine how each player actually performs each match. There are also other factors such as morale, home field advantage, etc. that come into play. Basically what this comes down to is that there is quite a bit that needs to be taken into consideration to field a competitive team.
Honestly, if you asked 10 managers to write this type of article you would probably get 10 different opinions of what the keys to success are. My experience in this type of league goes back to the inception of the L&AEFL when I put together a club called Catbel Athletic, which now competes in the SAEFL.
I also manage Texas Express in the WWEFL (which I took over towards the end of the first season), in GEFL I manage Kateliz United. I also attempted to start my own league based on this concept, before there was a program to actually run the matches. Needless to say I didn't have the time to put into it, and before very long, I folded the league. Since then this style EFL has stabilized with the development of a program by Peter Babcock to run the matches and gives the commissioners the ability to save a great deal of time.
As a person who continues to play soccer, I developed a club based on my ideologies of the game "the best offense is a good defense". See, I play sweeper, and have always played defensive teams in these leagues. Well, after about two years and only one title (which I fell into when I took over Texas Express for the Cup Final) I'm not so sure that this theory holds in this style league. When I took over Texas Express, I was put into a situation which was quite unfamiliar to me; managing a club which was in the cup final and also in contention for the league title. The club was, and continues to be, an offensive powerhouse. I was use to playing 4 or 5 defenders in tactics such as ZD, TS and ENF. The only success I had with my defensive tactics was in the second season of the L&AEFL when I had a ZD club that was on their way to a solid top 5 finish. Looking back on it now, I would have had no shot at winning the title against the more offensive style clubs. Look at how the SAEFL finished in season one. IQ took the title playing very offensive tactics, mainly WP. GU won the SAEFL Cup playing WH over MR who played WP. In the WWEFL Coltrane won the league title playing offensive tactics and Texas Express won the WWEFL Cup playing WH. So, in my opinion, it would be VERY hard for a club playing defensive tactics to win any sort of title.
Defensive clubs can EMP high, but all they are doing is limiting the amount of shots the club they are playing against will get. If a defensive club plays against an offensive club they may get lucky and shut them down, but they generally generate no offense themselves. Typically the offensive club will still win, but instead of 9-0 or 6-4 the score may be 2-0 or if they are a very strong defensive club the score may be 0-0. This does not mean that a overall weak club can start playing WH or ONE and expect to win over a strong ZD club. But if clubs are fairly equal, I would put my cash on the offensive club to win in most cases.
Now, don't think I have given up on playing defensive tactics or I am trying to discourage you from playing them. What I am saying is that in my opinion, it will be next to impossible to win any sort of title by strictly playing defensive tactics. The key word in that last sentence is "strictly". The clubs that are going to be successful over a long period of time are the clubs that have a handful of 2 to 4 tactics that they can play strongly. Edwin makes a great point in his article (see url above) about having 2 tactics, one for the win playing your first team, and a second tactic playing for a draw while resting your starters. In the case outlined by Edwin he plays his first team regular in an offensive style to get the maximum amount of points and he plays a defensive tactic with his second team to get the draw. This is very similar to the tactics that are often played in soccer around the world today; play for the win at home, possibly taking more risks and play for the draw away, attempting to shut down the other club. You can see how this type of game can be considered very realistic!
In his article, Edwin stresses the importance of trading. It is interesting to see managers who only target "star" players who can have an immediate impact on their success and trade and sell their younger players who are not that good yet for little in return. Holding onto younger players is like playing the stock market; you hope you get a good deal on a player that will help you in the future. This does not mean that I think a 18yo NSL 4 player should be worth 200K, but in a season or two he could be worth well more then that! For example, Catbel Athletic had a FB last season named B. Berlinnin who never played a match. He was 18yo and NSL 3.75. I was very happy when I got my roster to start season two and I saw that he was now a 20yo FB NSL 8! This will not happen very often at all, but my point is that trading is very important to the success of your club, but youth is critical to the long term success. It is important that you begin to fill your club with a "third team" of youngsters to take over when that 29yo NSL 9 player drops a point and a half to two points of NSL during the off season. This way you don't have to scramble to trade for or buy a replacement.
I rambled on quite a bit here, but I hope you find this insightful to your success as a manager. The important thing is to have fun. I have met some great people playing in these leagues and hope to some day sit down and have a cold beer with some of you and discuss our EFL strategies!
Vince Scimeca
2/23/99
SAEFL:Catbel Athletic
WWEFL: Texas Express
GEFL: Kateliz United